This is a demo store. No orders will be fulfilled.
Free Reproducibles
(Re)designing Argumentation Writing Units for Grades 5–12
Discover how to establish engaging argumentation units of instruction that empower students to present and convince others of their position.
Benefits:
- Examine the characteristic elements of an argument and the benefits of teaching students to work through how to structure an argument.
- Examine an argumentation unit map, its learning goals and guiding questions, and then develop one of your own.
- Complete exercises throughout the book that will help to create a comprehensive argumentation unit of instruction.
- Design a full lesson on argumentation, from establishing author’s purpose, to supporting a thesis with evidence, to presenting counter arguments.
- Download templates, checklists, rubrics, and student activities useful for designing an argumentation unit and guiding lessons.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1: Examining the Fundamentals of Argumentation
Chapter 2: Building an Argumentation Unit Map
Chapter 3: Formulating a Pre- and Culminating Assessment and Establishing Criteria for Success
Chapter 4: Writing Engaging Introductions Using Gradual Release of Responsibility
Chapter 5: Designing Lessons
Appendix A: List of Figures and Tables
Appendix B: Professional and Student Resources
REPRODUCIBLES
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
- Figure 2.1: Unit-Planning Components of Backward Design
- Figure 2.2: Unit Map Template
- Table 2.1: Argumentation Unit Map—KUDs and Guiding Questions
Chapter 3
- Figure 3.3: Argument Student Writing Checklist
- Figure 3.4: Argument Audience Checklist
- Figure 3.5: Orienting Students to a Writing Checklist
- Figure 3.6: Argument Writing Rubric
Chapter 4
- Figure 4.1: Cards for Modeling Engaging Introductions
- Figure 4.2: Introduction Examples
- Figure 4.3: Options for Engaging Readers
Chapter 5
- Figure 5.1: Text Excerpts for Author’s Purpose Activity
- Figure 5.2: Sentence Strips for Thesis Activity
- Figure 5.3: Sample Thesis Statements for an Argument
- Figure 5.4: Common Subordinating Conjunctions
- Figure 5.5: Elaboration Practice—Obesity
- Figure 5.6: Elaboration Practice—Minimum Legal Drinking Age
- Figure 5.7: Counterargument Sentence Frames 1
- Figure 5.8: Counterargument Sentence Frames 2
- Figure 5.9: Counterargument Examples
- Figure 5.10: Socratic Discussion Peer Observation Form
- Figure 5.11: Prewriting Suggestions
- Figure 5.12: Argumentative Revision Sheet
- Figure 5.13: Feedback Sheet for an Argument
SUGGESTED RESOURCES
Books
- Glass, K. T. (2017). The Fundamentals of (Re)designing Writing Units. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press
- Marzano, R. J. (in press). The New Art and Science of Teaching: A Framework for Change. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press
Websites
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
- 6+1 Trait Rubrics
- Achieve the Core’s “Argument/Opinion Writing: On-Demand”
- Achieve the Core’s “Student Writing Samples”
- Literacy Design Collaborative’s Resources
- Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity’s K–12 performance tasks across content areas
Chapter 5
- Adverb Clauses Are Subordinate Clauses
- “Author’s Purpose Commercials” by Amanda Spence
- Debatepedia
- Google differentiated search lessons
- Harvard College Writing Center
- “Mrs. Collar’s Author’s Purpose” by Nicole Collar
- The New Canaan High School Writing Center
- On Demand Instruction
- ProCon.org
- “Scaffolding for Socratic Seminar”
- “Socratic Seminar: The ‘N-Word’”
- “Socratic Seminar: Patience & Practice”
- “Socratic Seminar: Supporting Claims and Counterclaims”
- Teaching Channel
- What Is a Subordinate Clause?
- The Writing Center at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
General Writing
- Brown’s Student Learning Tools “Argumentation Help!”
- Dartmouth’s “Institute for Writing and Rhetoric”:
- Duke (University) Thompson Writing Program
- Google differentiated search lessons
- Harvard College Writing Center
- National Geographic Graphic Organizers Collection
- Purdue University Online Writing Lab
- University of Washington’s (Tacoma) “Teaching and Learning Center”
- The Writing Center at UNC-Chapel Hill
Argumentation Topics
- Debatepedia
- New York Times’s The Learning Network’s “192 Questions for Writing or Discussion”
- New York Times’s The Learning Network’s “200 Prompts for Argumentative Writing”
- ProCon.org
Thesis Statements
- Grammar-Monster.com’s “What Is a Subordinate Clause?”
- Grammar Revolution’s “The Subordinate Clause”
- On Demand Instruction
- ProCon.org
- The Writing Center at UNC-Chapel Hill “Thesis Statements”
Performance Assessment Tasks
- K–12 performance tasks across content areas
- LDC module templates for elementary and grades 6–12
- LDC science argument prompts and student work for middle school
- Performance Assessment Resource Bank
- Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction collection of K–12 informational and argumentation assessment prompts and rubrics for civics, economics, geography, history, and international perspectives
Student Writing Models
- Achieve the Core’s Student Writing Samples
- Brown’s Student Learning Tools
- Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects: Appendix C—Samples of Student Writing
- Holt, Rinehart and Winston’s Holt Online Essay Scoring—Writing Prompts:
- Literacy Design Collaborative’s Student Work Samples
- New York Times’s The Learning Network student contests and student contest winners
Oregon Department of Education’s Writing Scored Student Work:
- Grade 5
- Grade 6
- Grade 7
- Grade 8
- High school
- Oregon State University: Writing 121’s argument sample essays and web resources
- Thoughtful Learning
Rubrics
- 6+1 Trait Rubrics
- Edutopia’s Resources for Using Rubrics in the Middle Grades
- Kathy Schrock’s Guide to Everything: Assessment and Rubrics
- Literacy Design Collaborative’s Student Work Rubrics
- Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, State of Washington: Social Studies—OSPI-Developed Assessments for Social Studies
- RubiStar
- University of Wisconsin-Stout’s “Rubrics for Assessment”
- What Are Rubrics and Why Are They Important?
Calibrating to Score Student Work
- The Rhode Island Department of Education’s “Writing Calibration Protocol”
- Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, & Equality’s “Semi-Structured Calibration Activity”
Peer Review
- Calibrated Peer Review
- Eli Review
- Peerceptiv
- PeerMark
- “The Reliability and Validity of Peer Review of Writing in High School AP English Classes”
Published Works
- Detroit Free Press
- The Miami Herald
- National Geographic
- Newsela
- New York Times
- New York Times articles by Nicholas Kristof
- New York Times’s The Learning Network
- ProCon.org
- Slate
- Sports Illustrated
- Time for Kids
- Upfront Magazine
- USA Today
- The Week
Unit and Lesson Examples
- “Analyzing Famous Speeches as Arguments”
- Digital Docs in a Box
- EngageNY
- “English Language Arts Guidebook Units”
- New York Times’s The Learning Network’s “For the Sake of Argument: Writing Persuasively to Craft Short, Evidence-Based Editorials”
- New York Times’s The Learning Network’s “Skills Practice: Persuading an Audience Using Logos, Pathos and Ethos”
- Project Exchange
- Stanford History Education Group’s “Reading Like a Historian (Grades 9–12)”
- Stanford University’s “Persuasion Across Time and Space: Analyzing and Producing Complex Texts”
Organizations and Associations
- International Literacy Association
- National Council of Teachers of English
- National Writing Project
- ReadWriteThink
- Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, & Equity
Videos to Teach Argument
- TeachingChannel’s “Evidence & Arguments: Lesson Planning (Grades 9–10)”
- TeachingChannel’s “Read, Discuss, Debate: Evaluating Arguments (Grades 9–12)”
Socratic Method

